Handwriting Analysis Interview: Jennifer M.

Below is the latest video interview for the Handwriting University Membership site. This video is not for public viewing, only registered members and newsletter readers. Please leave your comments below the video so future members and readers can take away some bits of knowledge from viewing it.

------------ Special Newsletter Reader Offer ------------
Visit the discount page now.


To gain more from this video interview, make sure you download and print out the actual handwriting from the image file and do a full personality profile, before you look at the video. Otherwise, it will be like looking at the answers to the crossword puzzle, before you attempt the puzzle. You will learn MUCH more if you analyze the handwriting, make a comment below… then view the video.

You can find her full resolution handwriting sample in part one of the newsletter, located here:

http://handwritinguniversity.com/members/weekly-newsletters/jennifer-1/

Contains: Jennifer M., Video. Part One and Part Two. Conclusion of interview

Handwriting University’s Membership Program. Now just $17

http://handwritinguniversity.com/members/join-now-enroll-here/


1 Comment


  1. I like how the questions are in the order of the reveal, while also showing the specific traits to focus on. The faster pace is appreciated, along with adding extra traits noticed after the subject reveals her opinion, the additional tie ins and stacked traits found are also a big help to understand more complex stacking.
    This episode I missed the extra questions asked during the interview, to have a question posed then to quickly figure out the expected response using the other noticed traits, was a fast and fun extra that should always be used, not just the pre questions where we have the time to look and search. It helps a lot, just as quick stacking during a brief conversation can help really sink a point. Great job Bart, these samples and video interviews with helpful tidbits are fantastic!
    How about a harder test, pose a more advanced question with a given sample, then give readers a few days to respond, then acknowledge the closest reply. A prize would be nice, but public recognition for excellent work done, is far greater.

Leave a Reply